From 7ba2d029fe798331fe00c8107c5c305829e4a6fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Pilgrim Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:41:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] be more clear about current working directory --- unit-testing.html | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/unit-testing.html b/unit-testing.html index f9aba84..00efbf6 100755 --- a/unit-testing.html +++ b/unit-testing.html @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ function to_roman(n):

Execute romantest1.py on the command line to run the test. If you call it with the -v command-line option, it will give more verbose output so you can see exactly what’s going on as each test case runs. With any luck, your output should look like this:

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest1.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest1.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... FAIL            
 
 ======================================================================
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ subtracting 4 from input, adding IV to output
 'MCDXXIV'

So the to_roman() function appears to work, at least in this manual spot check. But will it pass the test case you wrote?

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest1.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest1.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ OK

Also note that you’re passing the to_roman() function itself as an argument; you’re not calling it, and you’re not passing the name of it as a string. Have I mentioned recently how handy it is that everything in Python is an object?

So what happens when you run the test suite with this new test?

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest2.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest2.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with large input ... ERROR                         
 
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ FAILED (errors=1)

Now run the test suite again.

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest2.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest2.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with large input ... FAIL                          
 
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ FAILED (failures=1)

Does this make the test pass? Let’s find out.

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest2.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest2.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with large input ... ok                            
 
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ OK

Now check that the tests fail:

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest3.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest3.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with negative input ... FAIL
 to_roman should fail with large input ... ok
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ FAILED (failures=2)

I could show you a whole series of unrelated examples to show that the multiple-comparisons-at-once shortcut works, but instead I’ll just run the unit tests and prove it.

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest3.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest3.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with negative input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with large input ... ok
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ class OutOfRangeError(ValueError): pass
 

Now check that the test fails properly.

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest4.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest4.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with negative input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with non-integer input ... FAIL
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ FAILED (failures=1)

Finally, check that the code does indeed make the test pass.

-you@localhost:~$ python3 romantest4.py -v
+you@localhost:~/diveintopython3/examples$ python3 romantest4.py -v
 to_roman should give known result with known input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with negative input ... ok
 to_roman should fail with non-integer input ... ok