Common Gotchas ============== For the most part, Python aims to be a clean and consistent language that avoid surprises, but there are a few cases where newcomers to the language often get tripped up. Some of these are intentional but potentially surprising. Some could arguably be considered language warts. In general though, what follows is a collection of potentially tricky behavior that might seem strange at first glance, but is generally sensible once you're aware of the underlying cause for the surprise. .. _default_args: Mutable Default Arguments ------------------------- Seemingly the *most* common surprise new Python programmers encounter is Python's treatment of mutable default arguments in function definitions. **What You Wrote** .. code-block:: python def append_to(element, to=[]): to.append(element) return to **What You Might Have Expected to Happen** A new list is created each time the function is called if a second argument isn't provided. **What Does Happen** A new list is created *once* when the function is defined, and the same list is used in each successive call. Python's default arguments are evaluated *once* when the function is defined, not each time the function is called (like it is in say, Ruby). This means that if you use a mutable default argument and mutate it, you *will* and have mutated that object for all future calls to the function as well. **What You Should Do Instead** Create a new object each time the function is called, by using a default arg to signal that no argument was provided (``None`` is often a good choice). .. code-block:: python def append_to(element, to=None): if to is None: to = [] to.append(element) return to **When the Gotcha Isn't a Gotcha** Sometimes you specifically can "exploit" (read: use as intended) this behavior to maintain state between calls of a function. This is often done when writing a caching function. Late Binding Closures --------------------- Another common source of confusion is the way Python binds its variables in closures (or in the surrounding global scope). **What You Wrote** .. code-block:: python def create_adders(): return [lambda x : i * x for i in range(5)] **What You Might Have Expected to Happen** A list containing five functions that each have their own closed-over ``i`` variable that multiplies their argument. **What Does Happen** Five functions are created, but all of them just multiply ``x`` by 4. Python's closures are *late binding*. This means that names within closures are looked up at the time the inner function is *called*. Here, whenever *any* of the returned functions are called, the value of ``i`` is looked up in the surrounding scope at call time, when by then the loop has completed and ``i`` is left with its final value of 4. What's particularly nasty about this gotcha is the seemingly prevalent misinformation that this has something to do with ``lambda``\s in Python. Functions created with a ``lambda`` expression are in no way special, and in fact the same exact behavior is exhibited by just using an ordinary ``def``: .. code-block:: python def create_adders(): for i in range(5): def adder(x): return i * x yield adder **What You Should Do Instead** Well. Here the general solution is arguably a bit of a hack. Due to Python's afformentioned behavior concerning evaluating default arguments to functions (see :ref:`default_args`), you can create a closure that binds immediately to its arguments by using a default arg like so: .. code-block:: python def create_adders(): return [lambda x, i=i : i * x for i in range(5)] **When the Gotcha Isn't a Gotcha** When you want your closures to behave this way. Late binding is good in lots of situations. Looping to create unique functions is unfortunately a case where they can cause hiccups.