convore.json/groups/divers-misc/ok-twitter-now-let-me-uncheck-which-bullets-i-want/messages.json

[{"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708145.141562, "message": "et en fonction de ce que veut l'utilisateur, \u00e7a utilise les tokens de l'application ro ou rw", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094937}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708178.947571, "message": "ah je pensais l'inverse", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094945}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708188.267097, "message": "que c'\u00e9tait plut\u00f4t binaire", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094946}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708233.7374561, "message": "comment est-ce que tu peux acc\u00e9der aux permissions \u00e0 partir du token d'un utilisateur ?", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094954}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708106.129863, "message": "pour les utilisateurs \u00e7a ne change rien, ils choisissent les bullet points sur la page du site tiers", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094927}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708026.4337089, "message": "https://twitter.com/davidbgk/status/70766101805531136", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094911}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708026.8325069, "message": "https://twitter.com/brutasse/status/70770147006218240", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094913}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708027.154819, "message": "https://twitter.com/davidbgk/status/70770360261414912", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094914}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708163.1500881, "message": "en fait oauth permet d'\u00eatre granulaire", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094942}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708716.1109819, "message": "pas certain que ce soit plus simple pour l'utilisateur que deux boutons, \"Sign in with twitter (read-only)\" et \"sign in with twitter read-write\"", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095116}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708271.719703, "message": "tu peux passer des param\u00e8tres d\u00e9di\u00e9s \u00e0 \u00e7a, attends j'essaye de retrouver \u00e7a dans la spec, en fait je l'avais fait pour mixin", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1094965}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708382.0299211, "message": "\"The information includes the duration of the access and the Protected Resources provided. The information MAY include other details specific to the Service Provider.\" http://oauth.net/core/1.0/#auth_step2 6.2.2", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095001}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709519.696686, "message": "le souci c'est que si tu as besoin des permissions \u00e9criture et que tu as d\u00e9j\u00e0 les permissions de lecture, l'utilisateur ne devrait pas pourvoir d\u00e9cocher \"\u00e9criture\". pour moi c'est pas bon comme exp\u00e9rience utilisateur", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095298}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708804.1490541, "message": "par exemple, un utilisateur te donne les permissions lecture seule, puis a besoin de lecture-\u00e9criture -> \u00e7a repasse par un cycle OAuth, twitter re-pr\u00e9sente les points \u00e0 cocher / d\u00e9cocher et l\u00e0 l'utilisateur peut faire n'importe quoi", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095136}, {"user_id": 14057, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709477.444546, "message": "https://twitter.com/#!/n1k0/status/70775991785627648", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095293}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708592.4506459, "message": "donc tu r\u00e9cup\u00e8res les permissions au moment de la r\u00e9cup\u00e9ration du token", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095070}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709337.796423, "message": "coch\u00e9es par d\u00e9faut comme aujourd'hui", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095274}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709954.8634009, "message": "hehe", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095370}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709637.418462, "message": "si tu d\u00e9cides que twitter doit garder le contr\u00f4le, ce qui est la base de l'utilisation d'oauth, \u00e7a me semble plus pertinent que ce soit lui qui propose le choix \u00e0 l'utilisateur", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095324}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708867.668052, "message": "(bonus, avec django-le-social c'est facile de g\u00e9rer plusieurs apps twitter ^^)", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095148}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305708993.499501, "message": "je sais plus si twitter avait r\u00e9pondu officiellement \u00e0 http://blog.benward.me/post/968515729", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095189}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [{"date_created": 1305709419.636919, "user_id": 14057}], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709329.5516241, "message": "il suffit que la liste actuelle propose des checkbox au lieu des bullet point", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095273}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709370.2622321, "message": "ah voil\u00e0, exactement :)", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095277}, {"user_id": 14057, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709919.0909669, "message": "c'est parti :)", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095364}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709587.652117, "message": "dans ce cas \u00e7a serait au service de proposer les cases pr\u00e9-coch\u00e9es par twitter", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095316}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709549.398762, "message": "alors que \"regarde ce que \u00e7a va faire, dis oui ou non\" c'est simple", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095305}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709586.4028189, "message": "disons que le probl\u00e8me peut \u00eatre r\u00e9gl\u00e9 maintenant par les devs tiers sans attendre le bon vouloir de twitter", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095315}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709644.6993251, "message": "et l'utilisateur d\u00e9-coche une case, retourne sur le service qui lui dit \"ah mais tu m'as pas donn\u00e9 les droits\"", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095325}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709839.682735, "message": "@davidbgk d'accord sur le principe. maintenant comment on dit \u00e0 Twitter de r\u00e9impl\u00e9menter tout \u00e7a ? :-/", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095356}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709866.7949829, "message": "on me RT :p", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095362}, {"user_id": 14057, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709677.9734769, "message": "@brutasse oui c'est simple mais clairement \u00e7a m'a souvent fait tiquer quand une simple appli pour faire des stats me disait qu'elle pouvait tweet en mon nom, et j'ai plusieurs fois annul\u00e9 dans ce cas", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095329}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305709752.2544739, "message": "dans ce cas tu peux toujours faire pareil que le pr\u00e9-cochage avec la possibilit\u00e9 pour l'application de dire \"ce choix est requis pour la bonne utilisation\"", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1095341}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305740605.218569, "message": "http://techcrunch.com/2011/05/18/twitter-revokes-automatic-3rd-party-dm-access-gives-users-more-details-on-app-permissions/", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1100623}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305740633.369628, "message": "enfin un mix des 2", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1100630}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305740677.414645, "message": "ouep, ils encouragent pas pasrticuli\u00e8rement \u00e0 enregistrer une app par niveau de permission", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1100638}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305741395.0356531, "message": "on va dire que c'est un d\u00e9but... l'app peut au moins choisir si elle veut lire tes DM", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1100714}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305740622.3884151, "message": "proche de ce que tu proposais finalement @brutasse :)", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1100626}, {"user_id": 10318, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305741360.9174139, "message": "http://blog.twitter.com/2011/05/mission-permission.html le lien officiel", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1100710}, {"user_id": 14057, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305753256.247978, "message": "/me a 4 heures de retard :)", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1103331}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305838338.6363089, "message": "\u00e7a commence \u00e0 devenir int\u00e9ressant", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1116302}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305838320.4514041, "message": "> How do we know what the access level of a user token is?\nThis is a great idea and one the team has discussed. What we are going\nto do is add a new header to authentication requests that will tell\nyou the access level of the token you authenticated with. We\u2019re\nworking on this now and hope to have it released in the next few days. ", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1116296}, {"user_id": 1167, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35758, "date_created": 1305838697.824827, "message": "par contre j'avais pas fait gaffe \u00e0 cette histoire d'xAuth, pour le coup je sais pas comment les clients natifs vont faire... OAuth dans une appli native c'est plut\u00f4t moche http://daringfireball.net/2011/05/twitter_shit_sandwich", "group_id": 6829, "id": 1116398}]