convore.json/groups/django-community/can-haystack-do-this/messages.json

[{"user_id": 214, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679258.163116, "message": "So the tricky part is ensuring you get some results from each category - avoiding edge cases where all your first N results are Groups and you get nothing for Topics and Messages? Otherwise it seems pretty straightforward if you have a search index on the type of object...", "group_id": 81, "id": 212205}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679450.0695961, "message": "That's a good point, will probably try that out.", "group_id": 81, "id": 212218}, {"user_id": 214, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679529.0292821, "message": "But you can do that on the individual type pages you get to with the More links.", "group_id": 81, "id": 212224}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679827.260622, "message": "No, you're not missing something, my brain was just somehow focused on getting the built-in view to do this crazy thing.", "group_id": 81, "id": 212240}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679362.79918, "message": "@carljm Yeah, but everything seems to be geared towards showing one unified page of results, as far as I can see", "group_id": 81, "id": 212208}, {"user_id": 214, "stars": [{"date_created": 1298679454.1815979, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679398.9048109, "message": "@ericflo Oh, yeah. Well I was assuming you'd have to write your own search results view and use the search API, rather than using the stock view.", "group_id": 81, "id": 212212}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [{"date_created": 1298778078.515363, "user_id": 12002}], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679853.894594, "message": "I tend to throw babies out with bathwaters", "group_id": 81, "id": 212243}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298678664.4638541, "message": "https://github.com/search?type=Everything&language=&q=django&repo=&langOverride=&x=0&y=0&start_value=1", "group_id": 81, "id": 212178}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298678711.5545771, "message": "You see, that's basically exactly how I want our search page to be, but instead of \"Users\" \"Repos\" and \"Source Code\" it'd be \"Groups\" \"Topics\" and \"Messages\".", "group_id": 81, "id": 212180}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298678743.154665, "message": "But I'm thinking I'm going to have to probably ditch Haystack to do it :(", "group_id": 81, "id": 212183}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298678791.871506, "message": "Anyone have any experience with this that they can share?", "group_id": 81, "id": 212187}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679377.238199, "message": "(i.e. our current search is just stock Haystack)", "group_id": 81, "id": 212211}, {"user_id": 214, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679419.1647899, "message": "But I don't think that's very hard, the built-in view doesn't do that much stuff.", "group_id": 81, "id": 212215}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679552.71875, "message": "Another really good point", "group_id": 81, "id": 212226}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679831.928668, "message": "I really have no idea what I was thinking, haha", "group_id": 81, "id": 212241}, {"user_id": 214, "stars": [{"date_created": 1298679542.796293, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679505.4005611, "message": "I think you pretty much have to abandon pagination and faceting on the split results page, not so much because of Haystack but just because it's hard to figure out how that could even work.", "group_id": 81, "id": 212222}, {"user_id": 7129, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298679776.5927269, "message": "I'm probably missing something, but can you not just do three separate searches?", "group_id": 81, "id": 212235}, {"user_id": 2024, "stars": [{"date_created": 1298778080.1169629, "user_id": 12002}, {"date_created": 1298789619.2993729, "user_id": 177}, {"date_created": 1299100725.6794281, "user_id": 927}], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1298729706.9004631, "message": "@ericflo life is certainly much quieter that way.", "group_id": 81, "id": 214310}, {"user_id": 3866, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1302069192.4083099, "message": "@ericflo Did u guys ended up using content_type for seprating differents objects?", "group_id": 81, "id": 555194}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1302069709.492686, "message": "@apoo nope", "group_id": 81, "id": 555224}, {"user_id": 3866, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9174, "date_created": 1302077865.4438989, "message": "@ericflo I am currently developing a search functionality for my experimental project and I am using haystack api, I was wondering how do u separate different objects? I am using django comments and it seems like, there are different content_type_id for each message", "group_id": 81, "id": 556458}]