convore.json/groups/django-community/configurable-views-in-sentry-2/messages.json

[{"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700441.951009, "message": "So being that we're completely denormalized, we have to decide how data needs to be queried ahead of time", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093543}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700446.516506, "message": "and the concept is that you define \"Views\"", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093544}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700425.0656559, "message": "Looking for some feedback on an implementation concept we're drafting in Sentry 2", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093538}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700537.834228, "message": "a view could be, for example, all events, grouped by \"function name\" (aka view), filterable by [event type, tag:logger, tag:server, tag:level]", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093548}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700539.606571, "message": "a view could also be, [exceptions, messages] grouped by url, filterable by [tag:server, tag:logger]", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093549}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700540.132226, "message": "So, does anyone have any use case outside of something like mentioned above for \"viewing\" events?", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093550}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700541.442169, "message": "(Events so far will consist of Queries (Slow/Unindexed), Exceptions, and Messages, just to get an idea of where we're going with this)", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093551}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700610.601373, "message": "also, here's example implementation details on how they'd actually be configured: https://github.com/dcramer/sentry/blob/master/sentry/conf/__init__.py#L77 -- the big things we hadn't thought about too much were explicitly deciding what tags to index on (vs indexing on all tags, in all views), and the \"grouping\" mechanism (which right now makes no sense, in the current draft code)", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093559}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305700751.3595681, "message": "And finally, the last decision to be made (assuming all of the above are dubbed \"good\"), is should the group key allow more than one item? e.g. should you be able to group by tag:level+tag:url? In that case it starts to make less sense as you'd have very few events and they'd just bubble up. I couldn't think of anything beyond a single tag that made any sense", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093595}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305701235.1414649, "message": "Oh, and the alternative to explicitly saying \"filterable by type\" is we index all tags for all message, which is just extra overhead, but its not as bad as it sounds", "group_id": 81, "id": 1093652}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305755617.550024, "message": "Adding another definition in that context seems like a bad idea", "group_id": 81, "id": 1103681}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305755578.433465, "message": "Random feedback, I'd try to come up with another name that view.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1103678}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305755663.3675771, "message": "Maybe slices or filters?", "group_id": 81, "id": 1103688}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305755603.5128469, "message": "It's already overloaded in Django to mean something that most people outside of Django don't get.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1103680}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305755629.3457601, "message": "It's a good name -- I'm taking it to mean the same thing as a \"view\" inside a database", "group_id": 81, "id": 1103684}, {"user_id": 22774, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35750, "date_created": 1305984807.2415421, "message": "@tswicegood Funny, before I reached the end of the thread, I was thinking about slices too! :D", "group_id": 81, "id": 1133902}]