convore.json/groups/django-community/django-on-nodejs/messages.json

[{"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302468812.4693849, "message": "*wonder", "group_id": 81, "id": 613711}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [{"date_created": 1302471377.1474819, "user_id": 521}], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302468739.083636, "message": "Looking at pow.cx i wish there was something like that but for django.", "group_id": 81, "id": 613677}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302468770.757822, "message": "I think the only thing we need to make that happen is wsgi server for nodejs, for ruby there's Nack (node's Rack).", "group_id": 81, "id": 613691}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302468793.112596, "message": "I couldn't google anything similar for python/wsgi", "group_id": 81, "id": 613696}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302468804.488728, "message": "so i wander maybe somebody working on it already? :)", "group_id": 81, "id": 613701}, {"user_id": 8740, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302471689.051156, "message": "Why do you need node.js? What's wrong with gunicorn?", "group_id": 81, "id": 614238}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302471747.343581, "message": "well it would be much easier to replace one class of pow, rather than making own solution :)", "group_id": 81, "id": 614251}, {"user_id": 521, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302471390.7107489, "message": "I am *so* jealous of pow", "group_id": 81, "id": 614172}, {"user_id": 8740, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302476466.992543, "message": "which is one of the many things people really like about it, it's easy", "group_id": 81, "id": 615227}, {"user_id": 8740, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302476419.145998, "message": "@dmishe But WSGI requires a Python implementation to work, and gunicorn provides most of what pow does", "group_id": 81, "id": 615217}, {"user_id": 8740, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302476456.0041349, "message": "In fact, for django, there's runserver", "group_id": 81, "id": 615222}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302476581.404501, "message": "hmm i've probably misunderstood gunicorn, thanks for pointing that out", "group_id": 81, "id": 615244}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302585656.3857579, "message": "Maybe the ability to integrate with virtualenv+virtualenvwrapper so you can run under multiple versions?", "group_id": 81, "id": 638233}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302585624.0039711, "message": "I don't understand what `python manage.py runserver` doesn't do that pow.cx does?", "group_id": 81, "id": 638229}, {"user_id": 8, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302587686.752095, "message": "Gunicorn doesn't serve static files so you have to muck with nginx configs too", "group_id": 81, "id": 638385}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302587897.3737869, "message": "pow is slightly different than manage.py runserver though, because it manages multiple web services, and it has no configuration", "group_id": 81, "id": 638405}, {"user_id": 8740, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302612104.3097589, "message": "@ericflo runserver has configuration? :)", "group_id": 81, "id": 641570}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302629644.2266879, "message": "@andrewgodwin Yeah settings.py", "group_id": 81, "id": 646203}, {"user_id": 8740, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302645511.8424549, "message": "@ericflo runserver doesn't really need anything extra in there, though - any Django project will Just Work\u2122 via it", "group_id": 81, "id": 651573}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302645683.1802039, "message": "@andrewgodwin true", "group_id": 81, "id": 651614}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669309.0695381, "message": "So the actual configuration happens for each project", "group_id": 81, "id": 657724}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669384.8232319, "message": "@tswicegood huh?", "group_id": 81, "id": 657753}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669585.7135229, "message": "It's just an easy way of running multiple projects at once", "group_id": 81, "id": 657807}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669320.7665679, "message": "At least that's my understanding", "group_id": 81, "id": 657733}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669328.5075419, "message": "Then there's configuration to get the app running... :-)", "group_id": 81, "id": 657735}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669469.493567, "message": "@ericflo Was referring to you saying that pow has no configuration...  Pow may not, but the Rails app still does, no?  If so, Pow just makes you think there's no configuration... or am I missing something?", "group_id": 81, "id": 657774}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669618.5239379, "message": "It's really useful if, say, you have one project which is a web service, another project which talks to that web service for its data, etc.", "group_id": 81, "id": 657812}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669638.9473851, "message": "So rather than spinning up two console windows and starting both up, you just symlink it, and pow takes care of it", "group_id": 81, "id": 657817}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669214.8412321, "message": "@ericflo So pow can run a Rails project without any configuration on its part?", "group_id": 81, "id": 657680}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669645.7422121, "message": "It's not a huge deal", "group_id": 81, "id": 657820}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669678.8621769, "message": "So for most Django things I think it would make little sense", "group_id": 81, "id": 657826}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669271.999702, "message": "@tswicegood I'm pretty sure it sits one level up", "group_id": 81, "id": 657712}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669293.568099, "message": "@tswicegood So it's as if you give it a django project folder, and it goes \"yep, I can do that\" and it manage.py runserver's it", "group_id": 81, "id": 657719}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669571.7680211, "message": "@tswicegood No you're not missing something", "group_id": 81, "id": 657802}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302669662.745934, "message": "And most Django projects just end up being one big project that host everything", "group_id": 81, "id": 657822}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302675724.4241741, "message": "in fact, my greins project is almost this (but lacks django), but with *nix lsb init target at deployment instead of apple mac shiny targeted at development.", "group_id": 81, "id": 660216}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302676021.5033579, "message": "If not I'll play with it.", "group_id": 81, "id": 660310}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302675770.9559369, "message": "if someone using django think it'd be useful I can help add django support.", "group_id": 81, "id": 660237}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [{"date_created": 1302675811.4078779, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302675597.9620099, "message": "It would be pretty easy to modify pow to use gunicorn to host I think.", "group_id": 81, "id": 660164}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [{"date_created": 1302751904.4747331, "user_id": 141}], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302676205.027385, "message": "regarding \"WSGI on Node.js\" there's JSGI which is spec for Narwhal-compatible JS environment that is a copy of WSGI.", "group_id": 81, "id": 660357}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302675794.313072, "message": "it needs an update to support logging config with newer gunicorn to be really nice", "group_id": 81, "id": 660241}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302676227.127398, "message": "but that's not where this topic went", "group_id": 81, "id": 660362}, {"user_id": 561, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302676013.7534339, "message": "Is there anything mac-specific about pow other than some paths hard coded into the sh installer?", "group_id": 81, "id": 660308}, {"user_id": 7376, "stars": [{"date_created": 1302736266.2697301, "user_id": 6894}], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302711609.545646, "message": "@tilgovi How is JSGI pronounced?  I hope it's not JizzGee, that's gross", "group_id": 81, "id": 666917}, {"user_id": 960, "stars": [], "topic_id": 18426, "date_created": 1302759380.7386971, "message": "@ericmoritz I honestly think that's what they were going for... :-)", "group_id": 81, "id": 679265}]