convore.json/groups/feedback/self-given-stars/messages.json

[{"user_id": 218, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856319.090111, "message": "What's not going to be sustainable?", "group_id": 88, "id": 45345}, {"user_id": 274, "stars": [{"date_created": 1296852657.328989, "user_id": 2}, {"date_created": 1296852793.1139779, "user_id": 274}, {"date_created": 1296854077.442596, "user_id": 1}, {"date_created": 1296863686.3323901, "user_id": 26}], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296852650.4914179, "message": "http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/3181659151_447b9c1b67.jpg", "group_id": 88, "id": 45208}, {"user_id": 218, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856060.14452, "message": "Should totally add badges. \"You've won the 'Conceited' Award!\"", "group_id": 88, "id": 45326}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856393.3173831, "message": "it's one huge advantage blogging has over these more recent innovations", "group_id": 88, "id": 45352}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856085.6060131, "message": "self-given stars make sense if you think of starring as a bookmarking function", "group_id": 88, "id": 45327}, {"user_id": 218, "stars": [{"date_created": 1296856643.125531, "user_id": 274}], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856122.9428461, "message": "I can't think of a reason why I would need to bookmark my own words.", "group_id": 88, "id": 45332}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856360.4476161, "message": "@justinlilly won't be sustainable to basically punt on perstience", "group_id": 88, "id": 45349}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856366.1448579, "message": "*persistence", "group_id": 88, "id": 45350}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856148.9157619, "message": "might be a way to keep track of interesting conversations", "group_id": 88, "id": 45333}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856156.7316501, "message": "although it would be better if you could star topics", "group_id": 88, "id": 45334}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856194.8771451, "message": "keep the starring feature the way it is, and add a new feature for users to be able to favorite/bookmark/save topics", "group_id": 88, "id": 45337}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856237.7444201, "message": "one of the things i've been thinking about lately is social web tools and persistence", "group_id": 88, "id": 45339}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856301.2458341, "message": "people are really going to want to be able to refer to old stuff", "group_id": 88, "id": 45344}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856346.741163, "message": "@justinlilly one of the most interesting ui's for online conversations i've ever seen was on this Lego community", "group_id": 88, "id": 45347}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856425.1892569, "message": "@justinlilly finding old tweets is a task so difficult i don't know if anyone actually does it", "group_id": 88, "id": 45357}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856450.9550259, "message": "@anildash has blogged about this subject, so i have to give him credit", "group_id": 88, "id": 45358}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856170.061342, "message": "actually, maybe that's a way to disambiguate those use cases", "group_id": 88, "id": 45335}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856244.842792, "message": "facebook and twitter are horrible about persistence", "group_id": 88, "id": 45341}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856288.0418291, "message": "as people use social web tools to have more and more conversations, for longer periods of time, that's not going to be sustainable", "group_id": 88, "id": 45343}, {"user_id": 218, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856241.7603559, "message": "Hrm. Would be neat to have a graph of conversations and how topics branch, etc.", "group_id": 88, "id": 45340}, {"user_id": 274, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856401.699188, "message": "I think that needs to separate the concept of \"star\" from that of \"bookmarking\"", "group_id": 88, "id": 45354}, {"user_id": 218, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856333.4425459, "message": "bookmarking? or conversations as a graph?", "group_id": 88, "id": 45346}, {"user_id": 218, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1296856400.7478111, "message": "Not sure I follow. You can still refer to the oldest of tweets, no?", "group_id": 88, "id": 45353}, {"user_id": 176, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297070766.7712841, "user_id": 176}], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1297070421.506892, "message": "So what does the \"star\" really mean? Does it mean \"I agree\"? I guess I've been trained by the \"star\" functionality in Gmail as being used for something I personally feel is important. It seems like a \"Thumbs Up\"/\"Thumbs Down\" type of feature would accomplish the goal of agree/disagree more clearly.", "group_id": 88, "id": 47345}, {"user_id": 176, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1297070902.5758319, "message": "I guess I spoke too soon. I see \"Starred messages\" in the group actions menu now. Though the list is not limited to stars I've given or received so it won't qualify as \"bookmarking\". Regardless, my previous post about agree/disagree still stands. :)", "group_id": 88, "id": 47390}, {"user_id": 176, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1731, "date_created": 1297070278.2904029, "message": "There's currently no way I can see to view messages I've starred so unless that changes then it won't qualify as \"bookmarking\" anyway.", "group_id": 88, "id": 47342}]