convore.json/groups/feedback/threaded-discussion/messages.json

[{"user_id": 9763, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298326037.044843, "message": "maybe if it could be turned on at topic creation?", "group_id": 88, "id": 172144}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298323617.1582091, "message": "at first i was like yeah!, but then i realize '@' thing works fine.", "group_id": 88, "id": 170473}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [{"date_created": 1298323699.187727, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298323674.6969831, "message": "i would not enjoy with threaded discussion as much as i enjoy this default way....", "group_id": 88, "id": 170515}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324022.920264, "message": "Actually, for all I know the API does this already... I haven't looked at it in detail", "group_id": 88, "id": 170798}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298323699.0164659, "message": "Please give your opinions!", "group_id": 88, "id": 170540}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298323593.114377, "message": "Thanks to @chandra for suggesting this", "group_id": 88, "id": 170450}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324080.7659581, "message": "@djchall It doesn't", "group_id": 88, "id": 170852}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324002.4457431, "message": "I think it would be interesting if the API exposed the message being replied to for each reply--that way third-party developers could build a threaded ui if they wanted.", "group_id": 88, "id": 170778}, {"user_id": 4893, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324874.2946441, "message": "Personally I wouldn't want threaded discussions for the simple reason that it is exactly that simplicity that makes convore so great. The moment you start having threads within a single topic, it's rather easy to miss parts of the discussion.", "group_id": 88, "id": 171549}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324528.2282641, "message": "'@' thing will work but there should be 'in reply to' option like old twitter used to have, Hope you know what i mean", "group_id": 88, "id": 171215}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324618.9785719, "message": "because if topic becomes too crowded, then it will be hard to track the replies.", "group_id": 88, "id": 171312}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298325066.2273121, "message": "@dirkessl so user can switch according to their needs? I'm not sure if that is going to be possible.", "group_id": 88, "id": 171721}, {"user_id": 9763, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298324991.9291949, "message": "a switch between flat and threaded would sometimes be handy", "group_id": 88, "id": 171666}, {"user_id": 13767, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298325760.714453, "message": "I guess it's pretty subjective, but I see convore more as IM than a forum-like setup, so threaded discussions would take away from the simplicity.", "group_id": 88, "id": 172131}, {"user_id": 9763, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298325221.744736, "message": "@Magazine3 I just like this feature on dpreview where I normally use the flat view, but can switch to threads when I want to follow flame wars :-) I dunno if it would be possible.", "group_id": 88, "id": 171874}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298325311.325335, "message": "@dirkessl  I would really like that feature, but lets see what @ericflo has to say", "group_id": 88, "id": 171911}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298326129.043498, "message": "@ericflo is the id for the message that is being replied to stored in the db?", "group_id": 88, "id": 172147}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298327592.3792801, "message": "@ericflo oh, really, that's too bad... with Movable Type, we debated about whether to do threaded commenting, but finally decided that we wouldn't build it into the default blog templates", "group_id": 88, "id": 172724}, {"user_id": 224, "stars": [{"date_created": 1298327623.7010391, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298327614.2780361, "message": "but we did store the comment reply id and exposed it in the internal API (and in template tags)", "group_id": 88, "id": 172729}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298327081.483681, "message": "@djchall Right now we're not storing that information, unfortunately :/", "group_id": 88, "id": 172439}, {"user_id": 3766, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298327326.043478, "message": "@ericflo yes, but i think you can make it, like if user wants flat discussion then twitter's 'In reply to' thing will be used and if user want threaded then same thing will display in threaded format. \nI think its doable,", "group_id": 88, "id": 172669}, {"user_id": 4156, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298354148.351126, "message": "The recent Async Python thread spawned 2-3 new threads, but only after a pretty long string of seriously interwoven discussion that got difficult to follow. Wonder if there are any technical solutions to shortening the time from \"introduction of tangent\" to \"split-off of tangent into new topic\". (Other than the post-as-new-topic link here.)", "group_id": 88, "id": 177342}, {"user_id": 4156, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298354183.6894641, "message": "For all their problems, threads are one solution to that. I agree they're not the right solution for Convore, though.", "group_id": 88, "id": 177343}, {"user_id": 13501, "stars": [], "topic_id": 7900, "date_created": 1298363955.2178731, "message": "may be a more painless \"new topic\"/\"fork to new topic\" could solve thread discussion, as when things get really threaded, it is better to be splited", "group_id": 88, "id": 177840}]