convore.json/groups/python/have-print-set123-produce-123/messages.json

[{"user_id": 37937, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41774, "date_created": 1310504816.78057, "message": "why is Python 3.1 and 2.7 recognizing {1,2,3}  but not printing (via str) {1,2,3}", "group_id": 292, "id": 1623244}, {"user_id": 37937, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41774, "date_created": 1310504841.8614991, "message": "instead you always get an \"ugly\" set([1,2,3])", "group_id": 292, "id": 1623247}, {"user_id": 20326, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41774, "date_created": 1310566480.2444489, "message": "This is not the case in my 3.1, and this probably isn't a change that will make it into a 2.7 minor release.\n\nIf you still have an idea you want to push forward, try the python-ideas mailing list.", "group_id": 292, "id": 1628699}, {"user_id": 37937, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41774, "date_created": 1311259971.0897441, "message": "python-ideas  sounds like a good idea -- but I would assume there is a reason that the (nice looking '{1,2,3}') 3.1 behavior was not backported to 2.7", "group_id": 292, "id": 1689985}]