convore.json/groups/ruby/ruby-for-simple-static-sites/messages.json

[{"user_id": 30672, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303944784.555301, "message": "What ruby platform/tool do you use to build a simple static site? I'd like to take advantage of things like templates and partials.", "group_id": 109, "id": 833747}, {"user_id": 28862, "stars": [{"date_created": 1304078803.5731931, "user_id": 26450}], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303945352.193855, "message": "jekyll's probably the most popular, but I like staticmatic", "group_id": 109, "id": 833831}, {"user_id": 28862, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303945383.9319799, "message": "(staticmatic has partials)", "group_id": 109, "id": 833836}, {"user_id": 4156, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303948279.4780371, "message": "Nanoc strikes me as the best in terms of flexibility/power, at the cost of requiring you to wrap your head around it a bit first.", "group_id": 109, "id": 834197}, {"user_id": 21274, "stars": [{"date_created": 1303957498.8997359, "user_id": 16047}], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303951776.044111, "message": "Just came upon this blog post: http://bit.ly/iDomly", "group_id": 109, "id": 834634}, {"user_id": 30672, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303957435.0723269, "message": "I like the look of Nanoc over Jekyll because Nanoc allows erb. But is anyone using any of these for client sites - assuming they don't need CMS?", "group_id": 109, "id": 835503}, {"user_id": 8192, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303972459.7478521, "message": "Clients would have to write some markup language, put the yaml header in it(in case of jekyll, don't know the others, but I'd assume it's similar), and put the file in the right place. Also, it is hard to write a menu containing all these pages then, but possible. I don't think jekyll and similar aproaches are good for customers without knowledge.", "group_id": 109, "id": 837521}, {"user_id": 1767, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303973048.6937621, "message": "Jekyll could have partials, too: https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll/issues/32", "group_id": 109, "id": 837625}, {"user_id": 19854, "stars": [{"date_created": 1303991968.8713701, "user_id": 28862}, {"date_created": 1304023678.9479971, "user_id": 14840}], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303986467.816505, "message": "I'm happy with staticmatic. I've been using it for a while and don't remember details about the other options, but I like staticmatic's templates and partials.", "group_id": 109, "id": 839054}, {"user_id": 2320, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1303998797.237165, "message": "I favor Jekyll, mostly because it doesn't have a lot of features.  I'm using nanoc3 for another project and although it's flexible with configuration, for my personal site I like the conventions in place over a lot of configuration.  \"It just works\"", "group_id": 109, "id": 841363}, {"user_id": 20419, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1304014834.6457441, "message": "I like staticmatic. It's barebones.", "group_id": 109, "id": 844839}, {"user_id": 30672, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1304022219.6789031, "message": "Is anyone using Toto? Seems a lot like Jekyll without liquid templates.", "group_id": 109, "id": 846774}, {"user_id": 28736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1304022482.2660871, "message": "There is also middleman, which I'm moving a static site to", "group_id": 109, "id": 846849}, {"user_id": 16058, "stars": [], "topic_id": 21715, "date_created": 1304320786.6167059, "message": "@scottweisman, it's not static", "group_id": 109, "id": 881064}]