convore.json/groups/tech/great-article-on-hash-fragments-exampleorgrealurl/messages.json

[{"user_id": 218, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297269303.6235421, "user_id": 2}, {"date_created": 1297269556.118274, "user_id": 6}, {"date_created": 1297271460.7828729, "user_id": 32}, {"date_created": 1297276005.2166059, "user_id": 216}, {"date_created": 1297376746.183104, "user_id": 6415}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297269031.586365, "message": "http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/javascript/BreakingTheWebWithHashBangs", "group_id": 97, "id": 51315}, {"user_id": 6, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297269605.6982939, "message": "Optimization is hard, let's make more HTTP requests!", "group_id": 97, "id": 51320}, {"user_id": 218, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297282131.732903, "user_id": 141}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297270239.5702801, "message": "Speaking of: https://github.com/sixapart/batchhttp", "group_id": 97, "id": 51330}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297273152.742425, "message": "Yeah, I don't particularly like this trend", "group_id": 97, "id": 51348}, {"user_id": 7, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297278487.2180979, "user_id": 544}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297273428.538394, "message": "pushState", "group_id": 97, "id": 51353}, {"user_id": 7, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297273640.091809, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297273432.0488319, "message": "get with it fools", "group_id": 97, "id": 51355}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297274700.6382711, "message": "namely: Internet Explorer", "group_id": 97, "id": 51397}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297274709.5266719, "message": "I guess the nice thing is you can just progressively enhance", "group_id": 97, "id": 51398}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297274691.850107, "message": "The problem, like with everything else, is that pushState isn't supported on everything", "group_id": 97, "id": 51396}, {"user_id": 242, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297278494.3887711, "user_id": 544}, {"date_created": 1297281560.243993, "user_id": 19}, {"date_created": 1297285555.073276, "user_id": 45}, {"date_created": 1297285901.7833121, "user_id": 891}, {"date_created": 1297298668.331316, "user_id": 1126}, {"date_created": 1297300698.8101251, "user_id": 1128}, {"date_created": 1297359487.5625911, "user_id": 4156}, {"date_created": 1297847031.0440781, "user_id": 8765}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297276375.092346, "message": "If push state isn't available the correct thing to do is to just reload the damn page.  Not generate crap URLs. :(", "group_id": 97, "id": 51576}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297278505.432385, "message": "YES YES YES A THOUSAND TIMES WHAT @dreid SAID.", "group_id": 97, "id": 52472}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297278709.4764171, "message": "(I might feel a bit strongly about this)", "group_id": 97, "id": 52568}, {"user_id": 1203, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297279406.312346, "message": "If everyone used webkit, we could finally be temporarily satisfied with the design/dev industry.", "group_id": 97, "id": 52966}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297280227.7705071, "message": "@bryangarvin Why? I don't see a problem with the current browser landscape other than mobile devices getting crippled mobile-webkit versions on them\u2026", "group_id": 97, "id": 53371}, {"user_id": 19, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297281569.197681, "message": "I feel extremely strongly about this", "group_id": 97, "id": 54090}, {"user_id": 19, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297282159.3052709, "user_id": 544}, {"date_created": 1297281616.932878, "user_id": 1231}, {"date_created": 1297282392.338249, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297281574.226836, "message": "hash fragments are a plague on the internet", "group_id": 97, "id": 54092}, {"user_id": 1231, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297281602.8072841, "message": "you tell 'em", "group_id": 97, "id": 54110}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297282251.319895, "message": "oh, too late.", "group_id": 97, "id": 54356}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [{"date_created": 1297282397.7412241, "user_id": 1}, {"date_created": 1297283299.0125771, "user_id": 1028}], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297282245.9934289, "message": "Don't make me link to http://dowebsitesneedtobeexperiencedexactlythesameineverybrowser.com/ !", "group_id": 97, "id": 54351}, {"user_id": 2276, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297285770.833452, "message": "@byriangarvin Nah, WebKit don't support the CSS3 object-fit!", "group_id": 97, "id": 56467}, {"user_id": 1207, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297287021.851027, "message": "And then there is this: http://www.hashbang.org/", "group_id": 97, "id": 57102}, {"user_id": 707, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297298494.3067861, "message": "wow, this is good to know. I hadn't delved deeply into this, but figured that #! was what google was encouraging, not a last resort structure.", "group_id": 97, "id": 61693}, {"user_id": 707, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297298511.8443711, "message": "glad to know progressive enhancement is still the first choice recommendation", "group_id": 97, "id": 61700}, {"user_id": 1203, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297352766.047534, "message": "@kurafire, my point was, right now the hate is on IE. if everyone moved from IE, then there would be a temporary moment of satisfaction in the industry before there was someone else who wasn't on the up and up on all things design/dev.", "group_id": 97, "id": 70713}, {"user_id": 2543, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297370526.372541, "message": "If you progressively enhance your page, all links will be fully working. Only the address bar will be \"broken\" or more truthfully, will require javascript to work. Why not solve that instead? Make user-agents recognize the #! and display/copy-paste the real url instead of the js-dependent one?", "group_id": 97, "id": 74210}, {"user_id": 2543, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297370350.6738729, "message": "I wholeheartedly agree, but think of tabs... We already have the content on the page... You think it's reasonable to provoke a full page reload on useragents which don't support pushState?", "group_id": 97, "id": 74141}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297778422.1742549, "message": "@andr3 If you do it right\u2014and, certainly these bigger sites have the resources to do it right\u2014you should be caching (almost) everything but the unique HTML content between pages. Thus, yes, it is totally reasonable to provoke a full page reload in those older browsers.", "group_id": 97, "id": 111328}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297778349.731813, "message": "@andr3 Yes, let\u2019s \u201cmake\u201d all browser vendors implement something they all despise. I\u2019m sure that will happen.", "group_id": 97, "id": 111316}, {"user_id": 19, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297804065.8506229, "message": "I think it's a fine tradeoff for tabs, especially since you get to use replaceState which doesn't affect the history", "group_id": 97, "id": 115198}, {"user_id": 19, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297804123.8881719, "message": "depending on what kind of tab it is, I usually just fallback to not changing the url at all for older browsers. So they don't get hard linking, but they get content swapping w/o a page refresh with tabs", "group_id": 97, "id": 115207}, {"user_id": 19, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1297804091.446008, "message": "I personally don't think that changing tabs on a page should ever affect the history stack (back button) and replaceState is the only solution for that to keep state", "group_id": 97, "id": 115202}, {"user_id": 544, "stars": [], "topic_id": 1970, "date_created": 1298380113.511287, "message": "In-page snippets of content spread between tabs to maintain visual simplicity -> yeah, that's fine, using fragment identifiers for that is okay. As long as, you know, you only make the layout fall into the requiring-JS-to-work state by enhancing it with JS, not by devving your page under the assumption of JS.", "group_id": 97, "id": 178904}]