further clarification

This commit is contained in:
2016-11-26 19:19:14 -05:00
parent 0dc24a34e7
commit cfce3eac7a
+5 -4
View File
@@ -25,11 +25,12 @@ I'll be blunt:
- Use Python 3 for new Python applications.
- If you're learning Python for the first time, familiarizing yourself with Python 2.7 will be very
useful, but not more useful than learning Python 3. Learn both. They are both "Python".
- Software that is already built (e.g. commercial software) often depends on Python 2.7.
useful, but not more useful than learning Python 3.
- Learn both. They are both "Python".
- Software that is already built often depends on Python 2.7.
- If you are writing a new open source Python library, it's best to write it for both Python 2 and 3
simultaneously. Supporting 3 only is a political statment and will alienate many of your users.
This is not a problem — slowly, over the next three years, this will become less the case.
simultaneously. Only supporting Python 3 for a new library you want to be widely adopted is a
political statment and will alienate many of your users. This is not a problem — slowly, over the next three years, this will become less the case.
So.... 3?
~~~~~~~~~