Merge pull request #20 from aitoehigie/master

Fleshed out the benchmarks section of the README.md file

README.md

@@ -124,14 +124,46 @@ api = responder.API(enable_hsts=True)
 Boom. ✨🍰✨
 
 # Performance
+The objective of these benchmark tests is not testing deployment (like uwsgi vs gunicorn vs uvicorn etc) but instead test the performance of python-response against other popular Python web frameworks.
 
-    python-responder v0.0.1 [stats]
-    Requests/sec:    952.54
-    Transfer/sec:    119.07KB
+### Methodology
+The results below were gotten running the performance tests on a Lenovo W530, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3740QM CPU @ 2.70GHz, MEM: 32GB, Linux Mint 19. I used Python 3.7.0 with the WRK utility with params:
+wrk -d20s -t10 -c200 (i.e. 10 threads and 200 connections).
+
+1. #### Simple "Hello World" benchmark
+
+    python-responder v0.0.1 (Master branch)  
+    Requests/sec:   1368.23  
+    Transfer/sec:    163.01KB  
+  
+  
+
+
+    Django v2.1.2 (i18n == False)  
+    Requests/sec:    544.54  
+    Transfer/sec:    103.18KB  
+  
+  
+
+
+    Django v2.1.2 (i18n == True)  
+    Requests/sec:    535.12  
+    Transfer/sec:    101.38KB  
+  
+
+
+    Django v2.1.2 (Minimal 1 file Django Application)  
+    https://gist.github.com/aitoehigie/ebcc1d3e460e66cd51e5501fa2636798  
+    Requests/sec:    701.53  
+    Transfer/sec:     99.34KB  
+  
+  
+
+
+    Flask v1.0.2  
+    Requests/sec:    896.24  
+    Transfer/sec:    144.41KB
 
-    Django v2.1.2 (i18n == False) [stats]
-    Requests/sec:    520.87
-    Transfer/sec:     98.68KB
 
 # The Basic Idea