Files
kennethreitz bf17b02653 Add tutorials: REST API, SQLAlchemy, Flask migration. Rewrite CLI and API ref.
Three new tutorial pages:
- Building a REST API: full CRUD with Pydantic validation, from scratch
- Using SQLAlchemy: async engine, lifespan setup, CRUD with ORM
- Migrating from Flask: concept mapping, quick reference table,
  gradual migration via app mounting

Also rewritten:
- CLI docs: cleaner, more concise
- API reference: added prose descriptions for each section

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-22 13:34:01 -04:00

193 lines
4.6 KiB
ReStructuredText

Migrating from Flask
====================
If you're coming from Flask, you'll find Responder familiar but different
in a few key ways. This guide maps Flask concepts to their Responder
equivalents and shows you how to translate common patterns.
The Big Differences
-------------------
**No return values.** In Flask, you return a response. In Responder, you
mutate it. This is the single biggest difference:
Flask::
@app.route("/")
def hello():
return "hello, world!"
Responder::
@api.route("/")
def hello(req, resp):
resp.text = "hello, world!"
**Explicit request and response.** Flask uses a global ``request`` object
(via thread-local magic). Responder passes ``req`` and ``resp`` explicitly.
No magic, no import needed — they're right there in the function signature.
**ASGI, not WSGI.** Flask runs on WSGI, which is synchronous. Responder
runs on ASGI, which supports async natively. You can still write sync
views — Responder runs them in a thread pool automatically.
Quick Reference
---------------
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 40 60
* - Flask
- Responder
* - ``Flask(__name__)``
- ``responder.API()``
* - ``return "text"``
- ``resp.text = "text"``
* - ``return jsonify(data)``
- ``resp.media = data``
* - ``return render_template("t.html", x=1)``
- ``resp.html = api.template("t.html", x=1)``
* - ``request.args["q"]``
- ``req.params["q"]``
* - ``request.json``
- ``await req.media()``
* - ``request.form``
- ``await req.media("form")``
* - ``request.headers["X"]``
- ``req.headers["X"]``
* - ``request.method``
- ``req.method``
* - ``request.cookies["x"]``
- ``req.cookies["x"]``
* - ``session["x"] = 1``
- ``resp.session["x"] = 1``
* - ``abort(404)``
- ``resp.status_code = 404``
* - ``redirect("/new")``
- ``api.redirect(resp, location="/new")``
* - ``@app.before_request``
- ``@api.route(before_request=True)``
* - ``@app.errorhandler(404)``
- ``@api.exception_handler(ValueError)``
* - ``app.run(debug=True)``
- ``api.run(debug=True)``
Route Parameters
----------------
Flask uses ``<angle_brackets>``. Responder uses ``{curly_braces}``
with the same type convertor idea:
Flask::
@app.route("/users/<int:user_id>")
def get_user(user_id):
return jsonify({"id": user_id})
Responder::
@api.route("/users/{user_id:int}")
def get_user(req, resp, *, user_id):
resp.media = {"id": user_id}
Note the ``*`` — route parameters are keyword-only arguments in
Responder. This makes the interface explicit about which arguments
come from the URL.
JSON APIs
---------
Flask::
@app.route("/api/items", methods=["POST"])
def create_item():
data = request.json
# ... create item
return jsonify(item), 201
Responder::
@api.route("/api/items", methods=["POST"])
async def create_item(req, resp):
data = await req.media()
# ... create item
resp.media = item
resp.status_code = 201
The ``await`` is needed because reading the request body is an async
I/O operation. This is more explicit than Flask's approach, and it
means the event loop isn't blocked while waiting for the body to arrive.
Templates
---------
Both use Jinja2. The syntax is nearly identical:
Flask::
@app.route("/hello/<name>")
def hello(name):
return render_template("hello.html", name=name)
Responder::
@api.route("/hello/{name}")
def hello(req, resp, *, name):
resp.html = api.template("hello.html", name=name)
Blueprints → Route Groups
--------------------------
Flask uses Blueprints to organize routes. Responder has route groups:
Flask::
bp = Blueprint("api", __name__, url_prefix="/api")
@bp.route("/users")
def list_users():
return jsonify([])
app.register_blueprint(bp)
Responder::
api_v1 = api.group("/api")
@api_v1.route("/users")
def list_users(req, resp):
resp.media = []
Gradual Migration
-----------------
You don't have to migrate all at once. Responder can mount your existing
Flask app at a subroute, so you can move endpoints over one at a time::
from flask import Flask
flask_app = Flask(__name__)
# Your existing Flask routes stay here
@flask_app.route("/legacy")
def legacy():
return "old endpoint"
# Mount Flask under /old, new routes go on Responder
api.mount("/old", flask_app)
@api.route("/new")
def new_endpoint(req, resp):
resp.media = {"modern": True}
Requests to ``/old/legacy`` go to Flask. Everything else goes to
Responder. When you've moved everything over, remove the mount.