convore.json/groups/devops-1/python-statsd-server/messages.json

[{"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298832316.9892781, "message": "We love statsd around here.", "group_id": 4827, "id": 219014}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298832305.0000491, "message": "http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2268466", "group_id": 4827, "id": 219011}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298832308.4475429, "message": "http://www.monkinetic.com/2011/02/python-statsd-server.html", "group_id": 4827, "id": 219012}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298832353.8628769, "message": "though the server implementation is from Joshua Frederick (jfred on github, twitter)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 219021}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298836121.4167399, "message": "I've been playing with this -- trying to figure out if the blocking socket has any downsides compared to an event loop solution", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220185}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298836161.789099, "message": "(so far, I don't see any - it's UDP on a single socket - so recvfrom will get a single datagram each time. As long as the processing doesn't take long, it should be ok... I think)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220197}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837343.877537, "message": "the middleware was just for logging stuff that's outside an app - like request and response times.", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220341}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298838048.2903171, "message": "but the \"no-remote\" thing made it a no-go", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220396}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298838105.283946, "message": ":D awesome! which posts are your favorite?", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220402}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298836242.9447839, "message": "Hah, I saw he had a few recent gists! I was wondering :)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220216}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298836205.42504, "message": "hi @kastner! Joshua is alos working on a wsgi middleware that uses the client. Something like this: https://gist.github.com/846449", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220206}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298836721.078155, "message": "Or is this more like (from inside the app) remote_call('/path/to/logging/stat-name')? This is how I approached it for a client - but that was so I could log from ASP :)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220294}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837902.7838831, "message": "it's a philosophical question :) We tend to try to keep things as stock/vanilla/boring as possible. For a varnish type thing, we'd probably use the normal logging and post-process them with our \"logster\" system (not OSS yet ;) but its similar to ganglia-logtailer http://codeascraft.etsy.com/2010/12/08/track-every-release/#comment-883)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220386}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298838012.6445501, "message": "heh", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220392}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298838033.244101, "message": "i actually applied to etsy, largely based on the codeascraft blog", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220394}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298838036.4840291, "message": "end of last year", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220395}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298836679.4067941, "message": "What advantage does a middleware have for this use case? You'd be batching your calls up (which is better for the server), but you're separating the action from the logging.", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220290}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837362.2556009, "message": "putting the client in the middleware, not the server.", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220347}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837555.5758281, "message": "does varnish have hooks for that sort of thing? or would you use the cache's own logging/stats?", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220364}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837418.6592131, "message": "you'd still run the client in-app for app-specific stats (logins, actions in-app, etc)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220351}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837511.4485581, "message": "(as a developer a lt of this devops stuff is new to me)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220359}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837390.4714789, "message": "I figured it was the client - was just wondering about the use case :) timing response times is a really good use!", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220348}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837495.7122569, "message": "@kastner - how would you handle logging stats for stuff served from a cache like varnish?", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220358}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837928.202841, "message": "gotcha", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220390}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298839188.1376591, "message": "Honestly, I read them all; it's the whole mentality I'm learning", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220511}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298837973.657017, "message": "we have a saying: \"We work hard to be able to be this dumb.\" :)", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220391}, {"user_id": 3868, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298839933.6192639, "message": "(the correct answer is \"The deployinator post - Quantum Of Deployment\" Changed my entire life) ;) j/k", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220619}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1298841280.1320779, "message": "oh, um, then... that one!", "group_id": 4827, "id": 220828}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1301602518.9666829, "message": "FYI, Jsocol at Mozilla did a nice daemonization of the pystatsd server", "group_id": 4827, "id": 495597}, {"user_id": 275, "stars": [], "topic_id": 9377, "date_created": 1301602543.4064469, "message": "Github.com/sivy/py-statsd", "group_id": 4827, "id": 495605}]