convore.json/groups/django-community/any-caveats-for-using-pgbouncer-with-django/messages.json

[{"user_id": 1147, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41462, "date_created": 1310133992.468632, "message": "I use it on all major deployments (Voxy.com is the latest). Works very well. It's installed locally on each web server between DB and the web server.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1593004}, {"user_id": 553, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41462, "date_created": 1310133468.018261, "message": "impressed by this experience http://www.askthepony.com/blog/2011/07/django-and-postgresql-improving-the-performance-with-no-effort-and-no-code/", "group_id": 81, "id": 1592938}, {"user_id": 11592, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41462, "date_created": 1310365239.752125, "message": "It just works.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1609974}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41462, "date_created": 1310440893.7267649, "message": "I'm told the new hotness is pgpool now.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1617575}, {"user_id": 11592, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41462, "date_created": 1310451295.1025391, "message": "@coderanger as you can see in the first post, pgBouncer clearly outperforms pgpool.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1618225}, {"user_id": 3885, "stars": [], "topic_id": 41462, "date_created": 1310470668.560087, "message": "pgpool is slower but it actually parses the SQL so you can do stuff like master/slave load balancing. If you just want a connection pool, the pgBouncer is definitely faster though", "group_id": 81, "id": 1619432}]