convore.json/groups/django-community/django-pserver-runserver-replacement-that-saves-your-fingers-and-time/messages.json

[{"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305464973.050416, "message": "if you're using a slow -ish machine like me, you might find yourself editing some module, then switch to the browser and keep hitting refresh while waiting Django's webserver to restart.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1059640}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [{"date_created": 1305482063.458992, "user_id": 33300}, {"date_created": 1305497023.8912621, "user_id": 6396}, {"date_created": 1305695189.8641469, "user_id": 2341}], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305464786.7281339, "message": "https://github.com/wil/django-pserver", "group_id": 81, "id": 1059635}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305465009.803371, "message": "with pserver, you just refresh once, and Django will serve your request the moment it is restarted.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1059644}, {"user_id": 2588, "stars": [{"date_created": 1305591463.45509, "user_id": 1127}], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305489490.266356, "message": "Nice idea. Maybe you can get that integrated into https://github.com/dcramer/django-devserver ?", "group_id": 81, "id": 1062761}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [{"date_created": 1305585521.4429121, "user_id": 33300}], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305531903.5811291, "message": "I've recently switched back from devserver to vanilla runserver because the latter seems faster on my old laptop, and I also realized that I've rarely used any of its features other than the werkzeug debugger, but we get that from django-extension's runserver_plus too.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1068431}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305531766.615294, "message": "will do that when i get some spare cycles.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1068424}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [{"date_created": 1305599557.446012, "user_id": 15988}], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305591491.7609661, "message": "@wil to be honest I don't use any of devservers features either -- we all run it though at the office for the threaded webserver :)", "group_id": 81, "id": 1076490}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305591589.9673891, "message": "I'm also +1 on integrating this with devserver, but it's a bit of a pain in the ass because RunServerCommand is a 1.3 thing", "group_id": 81, "id": 1076507}, {"user_id": 23352, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305618297.741926, "message": "Just tried it out, it works, made me happy. Thanks wil.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1079933}, {"user_id": 21294, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305637799.8760509, "message": "Awesome, definitely going to be using pserver.  Thanks wil.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1082552}, {"user_id": 14679, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305641983.4937389, "message": "Love it, this reuse-listening-socket behavior is one thing the AppEngine SDK does very well and it's great to get it in genuine Django.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1083327}, {"user_id": 213, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305663999.9208341, "message": "Sounds like a great idea to open a ticket in Django's trac *hint hint*", "group_id": 81, "id": 1087763}, {"user_id": 213, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305664104.217644, "message": "maby spliting the package in two version would make it less painful", "group_id": 81, "id": 1087785}, {"user_id": 213, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305664078.5464621, "message": "FTR, I refactored the runserver command before 1.3 to actually allow those kinds of things, sad that you support 1.2 still :(", "group_id": 81, "id": 1087779}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305711778.1333711, "message": "@jezdez yes i noticed your refactor.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1095575}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305711889.422905, "message": "it's a much cleaner patch on 1.3 though, so I'll try to produce a patch for trunk and attach to the ticket", "group_id": 81, "id": 1095579}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305711745.8997331, "message": "@jezdez http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16049 :)", "group_id": 81, "id": 1095573}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305711818.159467, "message": "why is it sad to support 1.2? We've got many projects on 1.2 and would be good to have that feature.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1095576}, {"user_id": 213, "stars": [], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305796857.5838599, "message": "@wil Well, 1.2 only receives security patches nowadays, so it's definitely a bad choice for any project, IMO.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1109809}, {"user_id": 15988, "stars": [{"date_created": 1305801556.8519671, "user_id": 213}], "topic_id": 35355, "date_created": 1305799926.4967411, "message": "agree 1.3 is the way to go when project is starting out or in active development. I've got a patch for the ticket which will obviously be 1.3 only. Need to make sure it works on Windows before I attach to the ticket.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1110107}]