convore.json/groups/django-community/strategies-for-porting-a-web-app-into-a-multi-tenancy-application/messages.json

[{"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371989.630136, "message": "yeah I see what your saying.", "group_id": 81, "id": 889890}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371933.836611, "message": "@convy It's hard for us to say without knowing more about your situation, how important multi-tenancy is to the project, etc.", "group_id": 81, "id": 889878}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [{"date_created": 1304372031.1497779, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371971.9147041, "message": "it's the end goal, but I want to get this up and running etc.", "group_id": 81, "id": 889888}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371827.39343, "message": "Yep that's pretty much what you have to do", "group_id": 81, "id": 889869}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371862.0876589, "message": "I've also used a combination of middleware and threadlocals", "group_id": 81, "id": 889870}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371751.6140859, "message": "for starters I would add a websiteID column to each database table, then modify each and every ORM query and ensure the 'where' clause is filtering for the correct websiteID", "group_id": 81, "id": 889856}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371792.5897241, "message": "I would then add a caching layer using redis/memcached to store html or objects for performance reaons.", "group_id": 81, "id": 889862}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371864.6361001, "message": "I'm building an app now, with the goal in mind to move it to multi-tenancy....and for prototyping I am making it single tenant db wise", "group_id": 81, "id": 889871}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371897.7629349, "message": "b/c I know that starting with multi-tenancy in mind will make the development much longer.  Is this a bad move?", "group_id": 81, "id": 889874}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304371956.3935239, "message": "If multi-tenancy is a hard requirement, it might make sense to tackle that first, rather than having to squeeze it in later.", "group_id": 81, "id": 889884}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304372044.802537, "message": "@convy getting things up and running is also a really admirable goal too...", "group_id": 81, "id": 889893}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304372072.5733211, "message": "i'm just fearing it will never get done then :)   adding multi-tenancy will probably make take 50% longer...I just know it deep down hehe.", "group_id": 81, "id": 889899}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374568.8784599, "message": "But yeah, basically any external app you try to use will need at least some retrofitting", "group_id": 81, "id": 890323}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374531.8905449, "message": "also the sites framework", "group_id": 81, "id": 890315}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374660.6362779, "message": "@coderanger So I'm looking at django-tls...why do they use werkzeug", "group_id": 81, "id": 890330}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374524.7041969, "message": "django-tls is very helpful for this", "group_id": 81, "id": 890313}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374661.718637, "message": "https://github.com/aino/django-tls/blob/master/tls/__init__.py", "group_id": 81, "id": 890331}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374671.37819, "message": "Seems like that could just be \"from threading import local\"", "group_id": 81, "id": 890333}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304375528.868818, "message": "@coderanger haha, fair 'nuff", "group_id": 81, "id": 890428}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304375568.8605881, "message": "::shrug::", "group_id": 81, "id": 890430}, {"user_id": 1, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304374873.9674129, "message": "I must be missing something", "group_id": 81, "id": 890360}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304375515.2800829, "message": "@ericflo I don't know, but it works and I've never had reason to question it :-)", "group_id": 81, "id": 890427}, {"user_id": 1736, "stars": [{"date_created": 1304375579.299516, "user_id": 1}], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304375566.304662, "message": "Also knowing Armin, it wouldn't surprise me if their Local fixes some obscure gotcha", "group_id": 81, "id": 890429}, {"user_id": 2588, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304378803.8798771, "message": "@convy This might be of interest: https://github.com/tuttle/django-schemata", "group_id": 81, "id": 890736}, {"user_id": 2588, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304378825.339731, "message": "...but please do heed the warning that it hasn't been tested in a multithreaded environment.", "group_id": 81, "id": 890740}, {"user_id": 4219, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304386450.19471, "message": "wow, that looks cool (in theory)", "group_id": 81, "id": 891803}, {"user_id": 26888, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304403647.405745, "message": "for example, if a module does site_id = settings.SITE_ID out of a class/function then you're going to have hard times.", "group_id": 81, "id": 894721}, {"user_id": 26888, "stars": [], "topic_id": 33287, "date_created": 1304403594.1351161, "message": "Multitenancy is a nightmare with some application that caches data that are site depend.", "group_id": 81, "id": 894717}]