convore.json/groups/django-community/what-happened-to-dcramercoffin/messages.json

[{"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306427710.2444811, "message": "Has it been dropped? Is there a new recommended way of integrating Jinja2 into django now that 1.3 is out or something? Many google searches turn up articles talking about coffin.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1193769}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306427572.50336, "message": "Once upon a time, there was a jinja2 to django adapter library (written by @zeeg I believe) called coffin. (https://github.com/dcramer/coffin) Now all of the links to it 404.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1193737}, {"user_id": 8695, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306427954.0473549, "message": "Did it get buried? :D", "group_id": 81, "id": 1193804}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306434882.243125, "message": "It was moved to http://github.com/coffin/coffin", "group_id": 81, "id": 1194806}, {"user_id": 603, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306433837.4480109, "message": "with django 1.2 it became a lot easier to write your own loader.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1194697}, {"user_id": 603, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306434101.5581069, "message": "see here: http://rosslawley.co.uk/2010/07/django-12-and-jinja2-integration.html", "group_id": 81, "id": 1194721}, {"user_id": 1930, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306435317.653084, "message": "somebody care to comment on \"write your own loader\" vs. what coffin is (trying) doing?", "group_id": 81, "id": 1194853}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306456458.702574, "message": "Ah! Thanks. My google-fu was weak. A lot of broken links out there\u2026 you might consider putting up a placeholder pointing to the new project.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1198120}, {"user_id": 1127, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306488039.8004069, "message": "@poswald I actually wanted to pitch that to GitHub. We asked them to move my repo since it had the most followers, but too many people link to it which causes a problem.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1202953}, {"user_id": 34429, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306503562.552649, "message": "There is a better jinja2 adapter library called Djinja (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Djinja).\nThis package integrates jinja2 templating system COMPLETELY into Django, and also have a load tag that \"emulates\" the Django one (with HAML syntax support).\nCheck the website_example folder for see how it works! https://github.com/SyrusAkbary/Djinja\nPD: I'm the creator of this package :)", "group_id": 81, "id": 1204887}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306506169.7487321, "message": "Awesome, thanks for the tip. Will check that out.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1205426}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306506935.0908489, "message": "Basically I have one issue where being able to pass a parameter from a template would save me a bunch of time and I'm sick of writing template tags to do that but I don't want to have to rewrite my whole application's templates.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1205564}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306506842.6372881, "message": "To be frank, I'm not that interested in HAML at this point. It might be a nice feature but I'm mostly just looking for the simplest way to adapt jinja2 to django. Ideally, I would love to be able to write all *new* templates in jinja2 and only do the old ones as the need comes up.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1205555}, {"user_id": 1930, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306514828.974371, "message": "@poswald - Just looking at @syrunakbary's code, it looks like the haml part is optional - just look at the hamlpy etc. area of his http://bit.ly/lKdZTM code.   The package is very young / new, though.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1206851}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306574689.8410571, "message": "I quite like the coffin approach but to be perfectly frank, I love the approach in this branch: https://github.com/GaretJax/coffin/", "group_id": 81, "id": 1211953}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306574763.657701, "message": "And it looks like someone has gone through the trouble of merging to be up-to-date: https://github.com/clamothe/coffin/commit/d171b735dd022858a57095896aa4378ffb8fea8f", "group_id": 81, "id": 1211957}, {"user_id": 6648, "stars": [], "topic_id": 36917, "date_created": 1306574827.575984, "message": "The ability to still use the Django style template loading mechanism and to be able to turn it off on an app by app basis seems quite nice.", "group_id": 81, "id": 1211959}]